e-rhizome 2019, 1(2):160-166 | DOI: 10.5507/rh.2019.009

Awe as a Social Emotion: An Overview of Insights from Social Neuroscience and Self-categorisation Theory

Anastasia Ejova
University of Adelaide
University of Auckland
23 Symonds Street, Auckland, New Zealand
anastasia.ejova@mq.edu.au

Awe tends to be defined as an emotion characterised by a perception of vastness that challenges or negates existing concepts of the world, creating a "need for accommodation". Emerging research on linguistic labels for awe-like experiences suggests that, while there is no universal word for disorienting experiences of vastness, there is cross-cultural recognition of encountering forces superior to oneself. Under the theory of constructed emotion in social neuroscience, the experience of encountering a force greater than oneself results in behaviour that serves group interests when those interests are part of the perceiver's concept of the vast stimulus. I argue that this is true in most cases, since awe-inspiring charismatic leaders, historical artefacts, and elaborate ceremonies directly represent group interests. Meanwhile, vast natural scenes encourage individuals to conceive of themselves in more superordinate terms (e.g., as human) within the scene. If experiences of awe-inspiring ceremonies, leaders, historical artefacts and natural features have a prosocial component that encourages consideration of group-level interests, it is possible that the "need for accommodation" component of awe is, in many cases, a social process. Within the framework of self-categorisation theory, it might be a process of adopting the identity of a group that is broader than family-based and friendship-based groups that one typically identifies with.

Keywords: awe; prosociality; need for accommodation; small self; theory of constructed emotion; social identity theory

Accepted: March 4, 2020; Published: December 30, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ejova, A. (2019). Awe as a Social Emotion: An Overview of Insights from Social Neuroscience and Self-categorisation Theory. e-rhizome1(2), 160-166. doi: 10.5507/rh.2019.009
Download citation

References

  1. Aranyosi, E. F. (1999). Wasteful advertising and variance reduction: Darwinian models for the significance of nonutilitarian architecture. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 18, 356-375. Go to original source...
  2. Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 713-770. Go to original source...
  3. Bai, Y., Maruskin, L. A., Chen, S., Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., McNeil, G. D., … Keltner, D. (2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 185-209. Go to original source...
  4. Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 1-23. Go to original source...
  5. Bulbulia, J. (2012). Spreading order: religion, cooperative niche construction, and risky coordination problems. Biology & Philosophy, 27, 1-27. Go to original source...
  6. Crivelli, C., Jarillo, S., Russell, J. A., & Fernández-Dols, J. M. (2016). Reading emotions from faces in two indigenous societies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 830-843. Go to original source...
  7. Drury, J., Brown, R., González, R., & Miranda, D. (2015). Emergent social identity and observing social support predict social support provided by survivors in a disaster: Solidarity in the 2010 Chile earthquake. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 209-223. Go to original source...
  8. Drury, J., Cocking, C., & Reicher, S. (2009). The nature of collective resilience: Survivor reactions to the 2005 London bombings. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 27, 66-95. Go to original source...
  9. De Deyne, S., Kenett, Y. N., Anaki, D., Faust, M., & Navarro, D. (2017). Large-scale network representations of semantics in the mental lexicon. In M. N. Jones (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive psychology. Big data in cognitive science (pp. 174-202). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  10. Ejova, A. (2016). Awe: A direct pathway from extravagant displays to prosociality. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000424 Go to original source...
  11. Gendron, M., Roberson, D., van der Vyver, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal: Evidence from a remote culture. Emotion, 14, 251-262. Go to original source...
  12. Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., Anderson, C. L., McNeil, G. D., Loew, D., & Keltner, D. (2016). The dark side of the sublime: Distinguishing a threat-based variant of awe. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 310-328. Go to original source...
  13. Hornsey, M. J. (2008). Social Identity Theory and Self-Categorization Theory: A historical review. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 204-222. Go to original source...
  14. Johansen, P. G. (2004). Landscape, monumental architecture, and ritual: a reconsideration of the South Indian ashmounds. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 23, 309-330. Go to original source...
  15. Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 297-314. Go to original source...
  16. Moore, J. D. (1996). Architecture and Power in the Ancient Andes - The Archaeology of Public Buildings. Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  17. Murphy, G. L., & Wisniewski, E. J. (1989). Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: What a superordinate is good for. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cogntion, 15, 572-586. Go to original source...
  18. Peelen, M. V., Atkinson, A. P., & Vuilleumier, P. (2010). Supramodal representations of perceived emotions in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 10127-10134. Go to original source...
  19. Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 883-899. Go to original source...
  20. Russell, J. A. (1991). Culture and the categorization of emotions. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 426-450. Go to original source...
  21. Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & Mossman, A. (2007). The nature of awe: Elicitors, appraisals, and effects on self-concept. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 944-963. Go to original source...
  22. Siegel, E. H., Sands, M. K., Van den Noortgate, W., Condon, P., Chang, Y., Dy, J., … Barrett, L. F. (2018). Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 343-393. Go to original source...
  23. Stellar, J. E., Gordon, A., Anderson, C. L., Piff, P. K., McNeil, G. D., and Keltner, D. (2018). Awe and humility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114, 258-269. Go to original source...
  24. Stevens, S. (1997). Conservation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Covelo, CA: Island Press.
  25. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  26. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A self-categorization Theory. New York: Blackwell.
  27. Wheatley, P. (1971). The pivot of the four quarters: A preliminary enquiry into the origins and character of the ancient Chinese city. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.